Recognized in the Industry
Badge - AV Preeminent 2020
Badge - Best Attorneys of America
Super Lawyers
Badge - Badge - Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
Martindale-Hubbell Client Reviewed
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in New York City
Avvo Reviews
NYC Bar Association

Blue Sky Laws

  1. What Are “Blue Sky Laws”?
  2. How Can State Regulators Investigate Me Under Blue Sky Laws?
  3. Does State A’s Regulator Have Jurisdiction Over Me in State B?
  4. What Are Some Notable Takeaways?
  5. What Are the Common Differences Between States’ Blue Sky Laws?
  6. What Is New York State’s Martin Act?

What Are “Blue Sky Laws”?

Blue Sky Laws are state-level securities fraud laws, that are generally analogous to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Back to Top

How Can State Regulators Investigate Me Under Blue Sky Laws?

Every state has a Blue Sky Law. Under the respective Blue Sky laws, each state generally requires issuers to register the securities and disclose details of the offerings at issue. There is a State Securities Administrator who is typically appointed to investigate all securities violations or complaints. The Administrator has the authority to order a cease and desist (for both current and completed investigations) and can publish their findings if an issuer is found to be in violation.

Back to Top

Does State A’s Regulator Have Jurisdiction Over Me in State B?

No, state regulators only have jurisdiction over you in the state they operate in, unless you are dealing with people in their state.

Back to Top

What Are Some Notable Takeaways?

State securities laws mandate registration or the availability of an exemption for the offer or sale of securities. Additionally, state securities laws provide certain statutory exemptions from registration. Most state securities laws are modeled after the Uniform Securities Act of 1956 (USA). The USA was established to create a uniform standard on the state level. However, the ultimate focus under the state statutes may differ amongst states. Therefore, it is imperative that your brokerage firm and lawyer review the relevant state’s statutes and regulations to ensure they are compliant with such rules.

Back to Top

What Are the Common Differences Between States’ Blue Sky Laws?

As mentioned, Blue Sky laws are generally similar to federal securities laws but may vary from state to state. Some notable differences to look out for include the following: notice and filing requirements; standards of merit review; duration of comment periods; suitability standard; notice requirements for exempt offerings; the requirement of legends on offering materials; and disclosure requirements. Most states have strong civil remedies and penalties, except New York, which has no private right of action for violations of its Blue Sky laws, meaning you cannot bring a Blue Sky law claim in New York. But likely have many other causes of action for damages.

Back to Top

What Is New York State’s Martin Act?

The Martin Act is essentially the anti-fraud statute in New York State. That said, the legislators in New York enacted the act to prevent fraud in the purchase and sale of securities, commodities, and certain offerings. Under the Martin Act, the New York Attorney General has the power to investigate, enjoin, and/or prosecute prohibited conduct. The Attorney General has discretion as to whether they wish to keep the investigation confidential or not. Moreover, the Attorney General may use subpoena power to conduct Martin Act Hearings, which is the compulsion of non-public appearance of witnesses for questioning. Lastly, the Attorney General may obtain data and information by issuing subpoenas requesting sworn affidavits. Under a public investigation, the Attorney General may compel public testimony and production of relevant documents. To conduct a public investigation, the Attorney General must obtain an ex parte order from the court, which compels individuals to appear in court to testify or produce records.

Back to Top

Attorney Advertisement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Testimonials From Former Clients
I highly recommend Jenice and her team at Malecki Law. I had a challenging, and lengthly case. Jenice was professional, very knowledgeable, and a pleasure to work with. She managed to make the process far less stressful during a very difficult time. They care about their clients, and it definitely shows. Mario
Jenice is truly a miracle worker and one of the top securities lawyers. She handled a very difficult case for us, displaying her legal knowledge, intelligence, and savviness throughout the process. I cannot recommend her enough. The quality of work from her team rivals that of corporate law firms. She was always available, extremely professional, and made sure to know all the details of the case. We were very fortunate to have been referred to Jenice and highly recommend her for any securities related legal issues. Nathan A.
An excellent professional who represented us in trial regarding a bank fraud, an unexpected and difficult time. A professional that worked hard, persevering and who stood toe to toe against firms that had a team of excellent lawyers backing them up. Her unflinching determination really stands out, it makes you feel you have someone who really cares about trying to recover what you lost from the people that wronged you. Salomon Levi
It is difficult to thank you in words when gratitude comes from the heart, so I will try to link feelings with writing. It is essential for us to mention your excellence as a professional, your aptitude on legal fields, and your unavoidable persistence. All of these virtues that elevate the profession you exercise in such an admirable way, go hand in hand with your sense of ethics, your human warmth and the transparency in your actions. To sum up, thank you for being a listening ear and for having the right word while transmitting information about the legal process. Having you as our representative during such an adverse situation was a privilege and enough reason for our eternal gratitude. Angeles Aparain
To say that my securities litigation was complex would be a severe understatement. With multiple parties involved and spanning many years, trying to understand the issues was daunting to say the least. Jenice and her team broke down the transactions by segment and by party uncovering every hidden expense. In the end, I was more than happy and could not thank Jenice and her team enough. I would not hesitate to recommend Jenice to anyone. She is highly professional, incredibly knowledgeable, well connected to industry experts, has a tireless work ethic and is so pleasant and easy to communicate with. Five stars for sure! Andrew Loughrane