Disciplinary Hearings & Subpoenas

Receiving a subpoena from any government agency or regulatory authority, like the SEC or FINRA can be a worrisome event in anyone’s life, be it a financial professional or an individual. SEC subpoenas are a common part of the securities regulatory landscape. While the SEC can and will subpoena anyone – registered or unregistered – who is potentially a witness or target of an SEC investigation, FINRA registered representatives are subject to FINRA Rule 8210 as well. Our team of regulatory attorneys can help industry professionals with disciplinary hearings and subpoenas.

FINRA Rule 8210 allows FINRA investigators to essentially “subpoena” a person – i.e., require that they testify on the record and/or compel them to produce documents – without actually ever getting a subpoena. Instead, FINRA uses what is commonly (and not surprisingly) referred to as an “8210 Request.” Failing to respond to a FINRA 8210 request means that you lose your license – and for full-time registered reps, your livelihood.

Read our blog "I Just Got An SEC Subpoena: Now What Happens?"

When the SEC calls individuals in to provide testimony, it will be in what is commonly referred to as an “on the record” interview (or “OTR” for short). Subpoenas for testimony will also be rather straightforward in that the recipient will know when and where they will need to appear to testify, but will typically not contain any clues as to what the testimony will be about. However, in advance of the OTR, you may be required to provide documents related to certain transactions, individuals, businesses, etc. that you will likely be questioned on in your OTR. You also may be questioned on documents or testimony provided by others.

Consulting with an experienced disciplinary hearings and subpoena attorney could be the best move that you make when faced with such a potentially life-changing event. The regulatory attorneys at Malecki Law have experience representing individuals in regulatory actions before FINRA as well as the SEC. Having an experienced counsel can greatly determine the outcome in your favor.

It is important to be properly prepared for responses to subpoenas, both for testimony and for documents. Now that you are involved in an investigation and potential litigation, ordinary words could have new meaning. Something that may seem harmless in an ordinary discussion could have a different meaning in a legal context – potentially exposing you to liability.

Once you have responded to subpoena and/or appeared at your OTR, the SEC may choose to formally charge you or it may determine that it will not pursue any action against you. While, the latter is certainly the preferred option, the former is certainly the most concerning. The SEC may pursue you civilly or criminally (typically through the U.S. Attorney’s Office).

The magnitude of the potential penalties you may be facing can include substantial fines, as well as losing your license and your livelihood. So, from the moment you receive a subpoena, your focus needs to be on protecting yourself, your savings, your reputation, and your license(s).


Significant Engagements with our Regulatory Investigations, Disciplinary Hearings & Subpoena Attorneys
  • No Action taken in FINRA investigation into alleged fundraising outside business activity and working on a transaction after their license being terminated in violation of FINRA Rules

  • No Action by SEC for 2 individuals after full investigation and OTR regarding alleged spoofing and layering transactions by trader and assistant

  • Obtained No Action Letter from FINRA Regulation Enforcement Department for Series 24 Supervisor under investigation for allegedly accepting client funds from an insurance annuity policy

  • Obtained No Action letter from FINRA for investment professional alleged to have altered Bloomberg screens sent to clients

  • Obtained No Action letter for financial professionals in matters involving allegations of embezzlement of client funds with sales assistant

  • Obtained No Action in case involving alleged private securities transaction and outside business activity for a securities broker involving Countrywide and life bonded settlements

  • Obtained No Action letter for investment professional for allegations relating to outside business activities

  • Successfully obtained No Action after Wells submission to FINRA regarding allegedly mismarking order tickets

  • Successfully represented NYSE floor broker in fully contested enforcement hearing on front running

  • Successfully negotiated favorable AWC settlement with the SEC regarding alleged violations related to intentional altering of an analytical model through sets of assumptions reflected in the Offering Memorandum of the Regional Aircraft Securitization Program Offerings (“RASPRO”) transaction

  • Settlement of Favorable AWC with FINRA relating to cherry picking and front running by a fund manager

  • Negotiated favorable AWC settlement with SEC for group of traders for allegedly operating an unregistered broker dealer

  • Obtained No Prosecution agreement from SEC for professional trader of US Inflation Trading desk related to alleged misreporting of losses on complex derivatives desk

  • Obtained No Prosecution for two brothers in an SEC insider trading case

  • Represented subpoenaed party in a SEC investing into EB-5 funding

  • Represented subpoenaed individuals in SEC investigations involving Variable Annuity Sales Practices at a major brokerage firm

  • Numerous ongoing representations of financial practitioners in negotiation disputes relating to Form U4 and U5

  • Numerous ongoing representations of financial professionals in OTRs before SEC and FINRA for alleged rule violations

  • Successfully represented Series 7 licensed broker in FINRA investigation relating to failure to report tax liens

  • Successfully represented Series 7 investment professionals in issues of FINRA investigation relating to issues of failure to report regulatory settlement with CFP Board and several states

Attorney Advertisement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Client Reviews
  • Jenice and her staff are all excellent - highly responsive, answer as many questions as you have in a way that you can understand, are very patient, sympathetic to your situation, and make you feel comfortable during a difficult and stressful time. I never once had to follow up - they always came to me to keep me updated by phone and mail. I highly recommend them.
    ★★★★★
  • I worked with Jenice and her team to successfully resolve a brokerage / securities related issue for an elder relative and was quite pleased with how they walked us through the process and took into account the challenges that age sometimes unfortunately present. They were all professional - and effective. I would use them again without question if the need arose.
    ★★★★★
  • Jenice is truly a rock star! My wife and I contacted her to help with a quick-turn-around closing on our apartment. Fast, friendly, and fabulously informed about the process and what we'd need to stay on track to close on time, Jenice never skipped a beat. She's a dedicated attorney that goes above and beyond for her clients. Honestly, what more could you ask for?
    ★★★★★
  • Ms. Malecki defended a commercial litigation case for my client, and did a very professional job. Her motion practice was direct and she was honest with the client regarding the merits of the various issues involved. She was professionally courteous but also held her ground with opposing counsel as required. Her billing estimates were accurate as well, which was greatly appreciated in order to make appropriate business decisions.
    ★★★★★