Recognized in the Industry
Badge - AV Preeminent 2020
Badge - Best Attorneys of America
Super Lawyers
Badge - Badge - Avvo Rating 10.0 Top Attorney
Martindale-Hubbell Client Reviewed
Expertise - Best Employment Lawyers in New York City
Avvo Reviews
NYC Bar Association

FINRA and SEC Investigations

  1. What Are the Reasons FINRA, or the SEC May Investigate a Broker?
  2. What Is the Difference Between FINRA and the SEC?
  3. What Is the SEC?
  4. What Is FINRA?
  5. What Does a FINRA Investigation Entail?
  6. What Is FINRA Rule 8210?
  7. How Do FINRA Regulatory Hearings Work?
  8. What Does an SEC Investigation Entail?

What Are the Reasons FINRA, or the SEC May Investigate a Broker?

From Jenice's interview for the Masters of the Courtroom series on
View Transcript

Regulators may investigate a broker for potential broker misconduct including insider trading, market manipulation, misappropriation of customer funds, and/or fraudulent misrepresentations, amongst other things.

Back to Top

What Is the Difference Between FINRA and the SEC?

The SEC is a governmental agency empowered to act by Congress, and FINRA is a not-for-profit self-regulatory authority (SRO) that is empowered by the SEC. The SEC has broad power over the financial markets, including focusing on individual investors. Meanwhile, FINRA has a narrower power, specifically with a focus on broker-dealers (known as member firms).

Back to Top

What Is the SEC?

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is created by Congress and empowered to act as a U.S. governmental agency. The SEC is the principal federal agency that oversees and regulates the financial markets. The SEC has the power to bring its own civil actions and can work with the Department of Justice (DOJ) in criminal actions. Further, the SEC can work with self-regulatory organizations (SROs), like FINRA, on investigations.

The SEC Divisions are as follows: Corporation Finance, Economic and Risk Analysis, Enforcement, Examinations, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets.

Back to Top

What Is FINRA?

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a not-for-profit SRO, which oversees and enforces its own rules against member firms and registered persons. It is important to note that FINRA is not a governmental agency, however, it is authorized by the government to oversee the financial markets. FINRA’s stated mission is investor protection and market integrity.

A broker-dealer must register with FINRA as a member firm. Registered persons are people associated with a member firm who engage in its securities business, like stockbrokers or branch managers. To be considered registered, the employees must pass certain securities qualification exams, such as the SIE and Series 7 exams.

FINRA’s Enforcement Department is made up of the following offices: Investigations, Main Enforcement, Market Regulation, Sales Practice, and Counsel to the Head of Enforcement.

Back to Top

FINRA Investigations
What Does a FINRA Investigation Entail?

Although FINRA is a privately owned self-regulatory organization (SRO), it has the power to create and enforce regulations in the financial industry. Through FINRA’s Enforcement Department, the SRO is able to investigate potential violations of securities laws. Investigations may include on-the-record testimony, informal interviews, and 8210 requests.

Back to Top

What Is FINRA Rule 8210?

Section 8000 of the FINRA Rules outlines the procedures surrounding FINRA Investigations and Sanctions. FINRA Rule 8210 specifically handles the information-gathering stage of the arbitration process. It provides clarity on FINRA’s authority in these matters. According to FINRA Rule 8210(a), FINRA has both the authority to compel a witness to testify at a hearing and to examine relevant documents that are in a member person’s possession. Furthermore, FINRA Rule 8210(b) states that FINRA may enter into agreements with other federal regulators to share information in FINRA’s possession. If FINRA shares information with other governmental agencies, those agencies must keep such information confidential and private from third parties. For example, if the SEC is investigating a broker and the SEC believes FINRA could have relevant information on the broker, then FINRA can turn over this evidence to the SEC. The SEC generally cannot provide this information to other governmental agencies, the communication remains between the SEC and FINRA.

Back to Top

How Do FINRA Regulatory Hearings Work?

A FINRA Regulatory Hearing is similar to a court proceeding, but there are notable distinctions. Under Section 15A(b)(8) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FINRA must provide a fair and impartial procedure for the disciplining of members and enforcement of the rules. FINRA employs an Office of Hearing Officers (OHO). These hearing officers preside over the disciplinary and expedited proceedings that FINRA’s enforcement action initially commenced.

Once FINRA decides to pursue a formal complaint, it files the claim with the OHO. The OHO serves the complaint on the respondent and then the respondent must file an answer. Once the respondent files the answer, the OHO gathers a three-person panel to hear the case. To avoid any bias, an independent hearing officer, who is a member of the OHO, is brought on as the independent adjudicator. The Chief Hearing Officer then selects two additional panelists from a large pool of industry members. These two other panelists could come from FINRA’s regional or district committees, market regulation committees, former members of FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC), former FINRA governors, and current or former FINRA board advisory committees.

The Hearing Officer conducts the pre-hearing conferences, rules of motions, rules on the admissibility of evidence, and issues decisions. The hearing panels issue decisions at the end of each hearing and the “losing” party may appeal a decision in which FINRA will perform a de novo review.

Back to Top

SEC Investigations
What Does an SEC Investigation Entail?

The Enforcement Division of the SEC recommends the commencement of investigations of securities law violations. The Division gathers information on potential violations from market surveillance activities, investor tips and complaints, other Divisions and Offices of the SEC, self-regulatory organizations (SROs), and media reports.

All investigations that the SEC conducts are private and will either be formal or informal. An informal investigation involves interviewing witnesses, examining brokerage records, reviewing trading data, and other methods. The focus of an informal investigation is broader, meaning that the SEC will rely on information provided by the company or individual being investigated. On the other hand, if a formal investigation is conducted, the Division's staff may compel witnesses by subpoena to testify and produce books, records, and other relevant documents. Moreover, the SEC will generally have information that clearly suggests certain securities law(s) have been violated and usually involves alleged violations involving large sums of money.

When under investigation, the SEC will not notify you, but rather, the Division will send a letter with a subpoena for documents and for you to give testimony. You must respond to the SEC in a timely manner or else it could lead to civil and criminal penalties. From there, you may request to review the Formal Order of Investigation. After the investigation is completed, the Division will present its findings to the Commission for review. Then, the Commission may authorize the staff to file a case in federal court or bring an administrative action. However, the violation can also be settled out of court.

The SEC may also issue the alleged bad actor a “Wells Notice.”

A Wells Notice is a letter spelling out what the SEC thinks you did wrong and gives you an opportunity to correct them if you believe they are wrong. People and companies hesitate to respond because it can be used against you at trial, however, it can sometimes be a useful tool in the defense’s toolbox.

Back to Top

Attorney Advertisement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Testimonials From Former Clients
I highly recommend Jenice and her team at Malecki Law. I had a challenging, and lengthly case. Jenice was professional, very knowledgeable, and a pleasure to work with. She managed to make the process far less stressful during a very difficult time. They care about their clients, and it definitely shows. Mario
Jenice is truly a miracle worker and one of the top securities lawyers. She handled a very difficult case for us, displaying her legal knowledge, intelligence, and savviness throughout the process. I cannot recommend her enough. The quality of work from her team rivals that of corporate law firms. She was always available, extremely professional, and made sure to know all the details of the case. We were very fortunate to have been referred to Jenice and highly recommend her for any securities related legal issues. Nathan A.
An excellent professional who represented us in trial regarding a bank fraud, an unexpected and difficult time. A professional that worked hard, persevering and who stood toe to toe against firms that had a team of excellent lawyers backing them up. Her unflinching determination really stands out, it makes you feel you have someone who really cares about trying to recover what you lost from the people that wronged you. Salomon Levi
It is difficult to thank you in words when gratitude comes from the heart, so I will try to link feelings with writing. It is essential for us to mention your excellence as a professional, your aptitude on legal fields, and your unavoidable persistence. All of these virtues that elevate the profession you exercise in such an admirable way, go hand in hand with your sense of ethics, your human warmth and the transparency in your actions. To sum up, thank you for being a listening ear and for having the right word while transmitting information about the legal process. Having you as our representative during such an adverse situation was a privilege and enough reason for our eternal gratitude. Angeles Aparain
To say that my securities litigation was complex would be a severe understatement. With multiple parties involved and spanning many years, trying to understand the issues was daunting to say the least. Jenice and her team broke down the transactions by segment and by party uncovering every hidden expense. In the end, I was more than happy and could not thank Jenice and her team enough. I would not hesitate to recommend Jenice to anyone. She is highly professional, incredibly knowledgeable, well connected to industry experts, has a tireless work ethic and is so pleasant and easy to communicate with. Five stars for sure! Andrew Loughrane